Back | Home |
ProterraTM Enzyme SystemTM Performance Summary Updated last on April 1, 2000
The following tables summarize data pertaining to the performance of ProterraTM tests conducted over the past several years on a variety of fruits, vegetables, trees, grasses, vines, and ornamentals (including flowers). The information and commentary are drawn primarily from a memorandum written by Richard D. Polley, originally dated June 15, 1998 and subsequently updated.NOTES
Test Results: Unless indicated otherwise in the commentary, all data represent ProterraTM- inspired production increases, in percentage terms, compared to at least one major control planting. In most examples, multiple plantings were evaluated. The results shown are divided into two (2) categories:
KNOWN means that the results were witnessed by a recognized agricultural authority (such as the University of Florida) and/or personal witness of tests by a member or members of the Technical Group Company.
REPORTED means that the results were reported by reliable commercial farm operations, and/or validated by ProterraTM agents (distributors and importers) observations.
All experiences and data are obtained from crop plantings of sufficient size to be considered statistically significant. In most of the ProterraTM results shown in the tables, the achievements of increased production/growth were obtained without the use of fertilizer.Commentary: The commentary indicates other benefits derived from the use of ProterraTM enzymes. It also indicates instances where data reflect other than increased production (e.g., growth rate and/or size).The results shown due to the applications of ProterraTMare all first season achievements. This is important because of the known positive "carry-over" effects from the use of ProterraTMon both the plants and the soil in subsequent seasons. Production is known to be progressively higher in the second season and higher still in the third season. Subsequent seasons typically continue the results obtained in the third season.
Validated By: Coded as follows:
KNOWN5.) ProterraTM enzymes are exempted from registration by the United States of America Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).I.A. The University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences
I.B. The Technical Group Company.
REPORTED
II.A. Reliable commercial farm operations
II.B. Proterra TM agents (distributors and importers) observations of achievement by users.
II.C. Chinese government
N.B. ProterraTM products do not change cell size. The increases in produce size are not due to cell "gigantism". ProterraTM is a bio-stimulator; it is not a fertilizer, it is not a plant food. ProterraTM does not contain hormones. It has been tested for carcogenicity, and is labeled "non-carcinogenic" as no carcinogenic activity is found.
ProterraTMEnzyme System Performance Data
PLANTS |
KNOWN |
REPORTED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results achieved with huge reduction in fertilizer use. Plant disease resistance was sharply improved, and shelf life of the fruit extended. More hands, more fingers. |
II.A. (Ecuador) |
|
|
|
Over previous season for controls. The controls were unable to produce any fruit due to extreme drought and cold weather. |
II.A. |
|
|
|
All ProterraTM-treated citrus, including oranges, grapefruits and pomelos show up to 50 % more production, and more sweeter juice. With ProterraTM, damage from leaf miner was insignificant. |
II.A. (Panama) |
|
|
|
Grapes double in size. Significant increase in juice. Sweeter taste (brix increase). One month earlier harvest. Near total absence of fungi, pathogenic and non-pathogenic. Increased shelf life. |
II.A. |
|
|
|
Production doubled (or more) in nearly every ProterraTM application. Fruit is normal in size. Fungi are no problem even in wet areas. |
II.B. |
|
|
|
Several Varieties |
I.B. |
|
|
|
Monthly ProterraTM application. Farm reported observations include ProterraTM treated orange trees that attained full ten-foot commercial production height in 3.5 years, compared to 5-7 years for controls. More juice. Increased sweetness (sugar content). |
II.B. |
|
|
|
Increased sweetness. Increased "shelf life". |
|
|
|
|
Increased cold tolerance: Controls killed, but no damage to ProterraTM treated plants. Continued to exceptionally high production harvest. |
I.B. |
|
|
|
Per harvest, depending on variety. Typically, when controls had one harvest, ProterraTM produced two harvests; when controls had two harvests, ProterraMT produced three, all noticeably sweeter berries. |
I.B. |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Shelf life increased by 2 weeks. |
I.B. |
|
|
|
II.B. |
|
|
|
Similar to lettuce experiences. Season reduced from 75 to 35 days. Extended shelf life by 2 weeks. |
|
|
|
|
Same as cabbage. Extended shelf life. |
|
|
|
|
|
Bigger, less "woody", and sweeter. Extended shelf life. |
II.B. |
|
|
|
Extended shelf life. |
II.B. |
|
|
In Panama, normal harvest season of 90 days was reduced to 30-35 days. When ProterraTM was used for normal 90-day season, 4-5 pounds heads were produced. No fertilizer or chemical of any kind was applied. Fertilizer/pesticides savings amounted to $700.00 per hectare. ProterraTM lettuce is crisper than controls and shelf life is 2 weeks longer. |
|
|
|
Extended shelf life. Better market appeal. |
|
|
|
|
|
Better market appeal. Extended shelf life. |
II.B. |
|
|
|
Earlier harvest and 2 ½ times larger. |
II.B. |
|
|
|
ProterraTM treated radishes are 2 ½ times larger than controls. They have a very pleasing taste, not the harsh, bitter taste of large control radishes. Shelf life increase is 5 weeks. |
II.B. |
|
|
|
As high as 350-400 %. The latter range was achieved in backyard gardens where ProterraTM applications were performed weekly to bi-weekly, by conscientious hobbyists. |
II.A. |
|
|
|
"Known" results achieved in Miami, FL., a non-coffee growing area. "Reported" from different plantations in Central America and Brazil. Less culls. Taste reported "superior". |
II.B. |
|
|
|
Under full drought conditions, ProterraTM plants received no water; control plants received water frequently. ProterraTM treatments demonstrated excellent drought protection. |
|
|
|
Chinas agronomists report "amazing results" with ProterraTM and pooled water (rice paddies). |
|
|
|
Increase in production with no fertilizer use. |
|
|
|
|
Higher Brix. Reported in Panama. Better Storage. |
|
|
|
|
|
Higher Brix. |
II.B. |
|
|
|
Sub-optimal application (late spraying) produced "Known" results. |
II.B. |
|
|
More stems and more flowers. Longer shelf life after cutting. Flowers reported to be more intense in coloration. All flowering plants to date, including orchids, enjoy multiple benefits from ProterraTM. |
II.B. |
|
|
|
|
Many types: Most important commercially are the ferns used for "greens" in cut flower arrangements (150 %+). Faster growing; earlier harvests; and better color. |
II.B. |
|
|
|
Size increase per year. Some types matured sexually years earlier than normal. Exotic palms, previously known to not reproduce in South Florida, reproduce and thrive with ProterraTM treatment. Queen palms planted in South Florida 12/'92: untreated, normal height about 7 feet; treated 40+ feet. |
II.B. |
|
|
|
Size increase per year. Some types matured sexually years earlier than normal. |
II.B. |
|
|
Overall growth in mass: trunk + height |
|
|
|
|
240 % - 280 % in trunk diameter; 150 % in height. In maturing pine trees, trunk diameter increases measurably every 3 to 4 months; no increase measurable in controls even at 1 year. |
I.B. |
|
|
Grasses have thicker mats, are healthier, mature earlier and remain green longer. ProterraTM materially improves cold and disease resistance. Also improved drought resistance, heat resistance. |
|
||
|
|
Increase in seed production, cold and heat and drought resistance. |
|
|
|
|
|
All citrus results generally similar to oranges. |
II.B. |
|
|
|
Increase in growth. Greater taste appeal to grazing animals is demonstrated easily. |
II.B. |
Researchers Include:
Dr. Hilton Biggs
Back | Home |